Community
Participate
Working Groups
The name of the JTAG device is saved in the active UI language within the launch configuration file. This makes it impossible to translate the names of the JTAG devices and share the launch configuration between different eclipse environments. Since each JTAG device has an id, this should be the key to finding the JTAG device rather than the "volatile" name.
New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/123186
The proposed solution is backward compatible, so if the new attribute does not exist, it tries to use the old one to look up the JTAG device to use for the launch.
(In reply to Torbjörn Svensson from comment #2) > The proposed solution is backward compatible, so if the new attribute does > not exist, it tries to use the old one to look up the JTAG device to use for > the launch. I like how you have designed it to be backwards compatible. But API changes after M7 needs approval. I have asked John to review as he is the committer in CDT most familiar with JTAG.
(In reply to Jonah Graham from comment #3) > I like how you have designed it to be backwards compatible. But API changes > after M7 needs approval. I have asked John to review as he is the committer > in CDT most familiar with JTAG. Ok, thanks.
Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/123186 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=a7b0a1fe806fa248e8e2c497f144177244e8f7e4
Thank you for the contribution, Torbjörn.
New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/123382
Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/123382 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=35b4bf02de354d0ec7d4ae3f96cc3951218a5ffb
(In reply to John Dallaway from comment #6) > Thank you for the contribution, Torbjörn. John, is there anything left to this bug? If not can you mark RESOLVED.
(In reply to Jonah Graham from comment #9) > (In reply to John Dallaway from comment #6) > > Thank you for the contribution, Torbjörn. > > John, is there anything left to this bug? If not can you mark RESOLVED. AFAICT this is done, if I got this wrong, please reopen.